Radar Speed Displays Go Up In Clinton, MO

Wanted to share a nice Facebook Post from the Clinton Daily Democrat (Click here).  Here’s to a safer year ahead for drivers and pedestrians and an increase in walkable routes to school in 2012.

It’s hard to argue from a statistical standpoint.  A study by the national Highway Traffic Safety Administration showed that 80 percent of all accidents are caused by one type of distraction or another. Another study showed that those who text while driving are 23 times more likely to get in to a collision.

I came across another study that actually ranked the danger level of eating certain foods as compared to others. Guess what came in as number one.  That’s right – coffee. They say that even with a lid, spilt coffee is a huge driving hazard. The full top ten includes:

1. Coffee. Watch those speed bumps!
2. Hot soup. Look out for noodle burns.
3. Tacos. It’s a challenge not to get any on ya.
4. Chili dogs. Especially while wearing a white shirt.
5. Hamburgers. Carls Junior boasts about their sloppiness?
6. Ribs and wings. Are you driving a car or a lunch wagon?
7. Fried chicken. Ever try to hang on to the wheel with greasy hands?
8. Jelly donuts. See chili dogs.
9. Soda. At least with Mentos
10. Chocolate. Especially on a hot summer day. 

All kidding aside, distracted driving is behind hundreds of thousands of automobile accidents each year. While bans on eating and other diversions may be taking it too far (what about driving with children? Billboards?), it is certainly something to consider.

And that’s one of the brilliant advantages of (here it comes…) radar speed signs (you knew I couldn’t resist the topic). The reason these digital displays are so effective is that they refocus the attention of distracted drivers back on to their speedometer and driving habits. It doesn’t require the threat of a ticket or increased insurance rates to get most of us to slow down. Studies show that the simple reminder that radar speed signs provide, is highly effective at slowing cars and keeping us safer. And now it’s off to the drive-through.

Looks like the drivers in France have had it. They’ve called for a day of country-wide  gridlock. Set for June 2, the protest is in response to the government’s recent decision to “hide” the thousands of speed cameras set up along the roads and highways throughout the country.

But it’s not that French citizenry are against safe driving, they simply object to the government relying on speeding drivers as a major source of revenue.  Since speed cameras first appeared in France back in 2003, their numbers – and the revenue they’ve amassed for government coffers – has skyrocketed. Last year, French authorities issued 9.3 million tickets from fixed and mobile automated ticketing machines, 4.6 million tickets as a result of fixed speed cameras and another 4.4 million tickets from mobile speed cameras. Yes – that’s millions.

As you can imagine, the zealousness of the traffic police has resulted in a boom business for GPS companies that warn motorists of upcoming speed traps. The apps have become so popular (it’s estimated that 6.1 million French drivers use radar warning devices) that the government has noticed a 17% decline in speeding ticket revenue. So to stem this decline, officials recently took down warning signs alerting motorists of approaching speed cameras, and legislators quickly acted to make the GPS warning devices illegal. And hence, the June 2 protest.

Luckily for U.S. drivers, early – typically less dramatic – protests from drivers in Arizona, California and other states across the country have limited the use of radar cameras. The word is out that driver safety is good but relying on deceptive ticketing practices to generate local government revenue is not acceptable.

I believe this is one of the reasons that employing radar speed signs has become an increasingly welcomed alternative to speed cameras. In most cases, radar speed signs are not equipped with speed cameras. They don’t ticket drivers; they just get them to slow down.

That’s why the city of San Ramon California recently installed a dozen new radar speed signs throughout the city’s jurisdiction. According to the local police, they’ve seen a decrease in average speed of 6.3 mph – to 10 mph in all twelve areas where the new signs have been placed. Perhaps just as importantly, the feedback from the locals has been positive.

A similar story can be told in Topeka Kansas where the city recently began using both permanently mounted radar speed signs and speed trailer-mounted signs for mobile use. In Pennsylvania, new radar speed signs are being welcomed by drivers in Union Township, Hines Township, Morris Township, Woodward Township and elsewhere throughout the state.

So if you’re planning on visiting France, you may want to take along a little extra cash to pay for speeding tickets – consider it just part of the experience. But if you come across a radar speed sign, check your speedometer, drive safe and smile knowing it’s there for your safety – not your money.

In a 2008 study conducted by the Texas Transportation Institute, radar speed signs topped the list of safety devices tested in short-term maintenance work zones. The speedcheck signs not only provided the largest speed reduction among the various traffic-calming methods reviewed, but workers reported that when mounted onto a trailer, the installation and removal of the signs was reasonable for even short-term work zone projects.

The Minnesota Department of Transportation first began using radar speed signs in work zones several years ago. Originally embraced by the department’s metro area maintenance crews, the electronic displays helped keep traffic moving at a safe speed while workers filled potholes. As the effectiveness of the speedcheck signs became clear, demand for their use spread. Today, Mn/DOT has expanded the deployment of radar speed signs to include use in construction sites, on ongoing maintenance projects and for other hazardous work zone applications.

“We often mount a radar speed sign along with an arrow board to the tail gate of one of our trucks,” said Marvin Sohlo, work zone standards engineer for MnDOT. “When we use the radar speed signs, it’s easy to observe the break lights come on. On a multi-lane highway, we’ve found average speeds are typically reduced by 8 to 10 miles per hour.”

Reducing speed is a critical issue for those concerned with work zone safety. According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) nearly 1,000 people are killed and more than 40,000 injured each year as a result of motor vehicle crashes in work zones. The majority of these cases involve excessive speeds.

“It’s estimated that more than 20 percent of our national highway system is currently under construction,” said Gary ODell, president of Information Display Company, a leading U.S. manufacturer of radar speed signs. “That equates to about 3,000 work zones on U.S. highways alone. You can add thousands more when you include work being done on public streets, around construction sites and on public works projects.”

Tad Blanton is the field operations supervisor for Medford, Oregon Public Works. He manages four crews that work year round on every type of public works project from underground maintenance to structural repairs, paving and concrete work. Concerned with worker safety, he attended a demonstration of a portable radar speed sign presented by IDC, and then signed up for a three-week free rental program.

“Providence brought the radar speed sign to us just when we needed it,” said Blanton. “We were about to begin work on a storm drain repair along the intersection of a busy four lane thoroughfare. We placed the sign about 350 feet before the work. The crew that I had out there said that the difference the display made was absolutely unbelievable. I knew are traditional warning signs wouldn’t of had nearly the same effect.”

Happy New Year and welcome to 2011. It’s a new day.

And for the world of traffic-calming radar speed signs, the new year is starting off with quite a stir. The folks at Information Display Company just introduced a new MUTCD- and NHTSA-compliant speed trailer that is creating a real buzz throughout the industry. But just look at it. You can instantly see why.

A Real Game Changer

Yes, that’s a speed trailer – the new SpeedCheck DuraTrailer. Turns out that after about a zillion years of the same old speed trailer design, the engineers at IDC thought it was time for a change. The old design had so many flaws but was so ubiquitous for so long, that we’ve all assumed that’s simply the way it is. IDC engineers thought differently.

It started with a simple question, “Why are so many portable radar speed signs left back in the warehouse rather than being deployed with work crews or traffic patrol units?” More often than not, the answer they found pointed to the speed trailer – the equipment that was used to transport the radar speed signs from place to place: they were heavy and hard to maneuver, they were often broken or in some state of disrepair. They were hard to set up. In a nutshell, if the speed trailers were working at all, they were just too big of a pain to use.

Now comes the SpeedCheck DuraTrailer.

Rethinking speed trailer design from the ground up, the DuraTrailer is an entirely new beast. Here’s just a few of the differences:

• It’s lightweight and balanced. One person can easily move it manually from place to place and hook it up to a car or truck.
• It’s made to last. For instance, it incorporates a heavy duty galvanized frame that cane easily withstand the worst road salt and weather conditions.
• Its one-piece molded cover completely protects the speed trailer’s components from the elements and WONT RUST.
• The offset pole design brings the display up front and closer to the view of the driver. The low footprint makes sure workers and pedestrians are clearly visible and not hidden by the machinery.
• It’s simple to remove the radar speed sign so you can use the display for other applications. Or you can easily replace the radar speed display with a variable speed limit sign, intelligent traffic sign or other display.

This isn’t the first innovation introduced by Information Display Company. These are the same guys that have patents and unique designs that upped the bar for vandal resistance, remote office functionality, glare resistant displays and multi-display time sync. It’s nice to see U.S. ingenuity and manufacturing is still alive and well.

So here’s to a great year ahead. We’re out of the shoot with quite a blast.

In cities across the country, getting local governments to respond to traffic-calming issues can be difficult even during the best of times. It becomes even more difficult when times are tough and municipal funds are short.

There is hope however. Neighborhood groups and private citizens from San Jose, California to Brooklyn, New York are finding strategies that are getting the attention of their local representatives. Whether you’re looking to install a speed bump, erect a speedcheck radar speed sign or just get the police to monitor traffic during peak hours, here are a few tips on how you can increase your chances of being heard.

1.  Join a group. Look to see if there is already an existing sympathetic neighborhood organization you can join. Government reps are much more likely to listen to an established group than to a single individual. There are also federal traffic safety grants that are only available to civic groups and other established organizations.  aaaaa

2.  Create your own group. If there isn’t already an audience for your cause, create one. A good place to start would be existing clubs with sympathetic ears – perhaps bicycle riders, school moms or retail shop owners. 

3.  Get on the web. Starting your own blog or social network site is easy to do. They provide a perfect platform for expressing your concerns and a great way to enlist the help and support of others. Your blog or Facebook page will not only be visible to fans, but can also be shared with local reporters and government officials. As the number of participants and grows, so do your chances of getting heard by those that can make a difference. 

4.   Local programs. Most cities have comprehensive programs in place for evaluating and choosing traffic projects to attack. Processes for selection are usually well defined by city officials, so know the rules and see what you might be able to do to get to the top of the priority list.

5.   Apply for a grant. There are three types of grants generally available for traffic safety programs.  Federal grants, State grants and private grants. Thanks to the Internet researching these options is fairly easy to do. A good place to start is www.cfda.gov, a database of all Federal programs available to state and local governments. 

6.   Come prepared. There’s no easier way to persuade a reluctant official to your side of an argument than to come with the facts and figures that back you up. Learn in advance about the various options available for slowing cars (check out www.stopspeeders.org ). Some are less expensive than others. Some are easier to install. Find out what options your town usually employs and see how effective their results have been in the past. Technologies have changed over the last decade and what might have been the best solution in the past may now be overshadowed by newer, better options.

A group of doctors in the Southeast Asian country of Laos are so excited about this little news bit that I had to share it with everyone here.

Doctors in Laos welcome the country's first radar speed sign

Not too long ago, Gary over at Information Display Company received an e-mail from a Dr. Guenther Slesak, a physician representing a group of doctors headquartered in Lao People’s Democratic Republic. As part of a medical team in the area, Dr. Slesak has been providing medical care to the citizens of Luang Namtha, the largest city in Luang Namtha Province.

In the e-mail, Dr. Slesak noted that the medical facilities where he works has seen a steady increase in patients sustaining injuries caused by traffic accidents. In fact, a study conducted by a local hospital found that beginning in early 2007, road traffic accident patients had become the most frequent cause of admissions to the facilities and that the category “traffic accidents” was informally labeled the “new epidemic disease” in the area. Furthermore, it was determined that the single largest contributing factor to the road traffic accidents was excessive speeding.

Out of desperation, Dr. Slesak began researching viable methods used to slow cars. Report after report highlighted the effectiveness of radar speed signs at reducing traffic speeds and decreasing accidents…and that led to his e-mail to Information Display Company.

A couple of months later, a new speedcheck sign arrived in Luang Namtha – the first ever in all of Laos. The medical team handed it over to the grateful provincial traffic police and the speed display’s posting was reportedly met with a small celebration from the locals. I’ll keep you updated as results of the radar speed sign’s effectiveness is evaluated.

Truckee California, Atlanta Georgia and Winnipeg, Canada are a few of the latest cities to deploy radar speed signs in a big way. The growing acceptance of these traffic-calming displays is particularly noteworthy given the correlating decline in the popularity of speedbumps and radar speed cameras.

radar speed signs' increasing popularity

According to Sam Katz, the mayor of Winnipeg, their recent installation of seven solar-powered radar speed signs is “anything but a cash grab,” – one of the major concerns of Winnepeg citizens opposed to speed cameras. Studies show that radar speed signs are highly effective at slowing cars without being obtrusive or financially threatening (spelled t.i.c.k.e.t). Katz made it clear that none of the new displays will take pictures or be used to issue tickets.

In California, the city of Truckee took advantage of funding provided by the federal Safe Routes to School program to buy and install six flashing crosswalk signs and radar speed signs. The displays are being permanently mounted along a busy school route and are intended to be operational in time for the 2010-11 school year.

And then last year, residents of Wildwood, Georgia, a city just North of downtown Atlanta, used the data collected by a radar speed sign to convince local police that there was a major speeding problem around their local school zones. Surprising to many who analyzed follow up data, that the majority of speeders were local residents. This, however, coincides with findings of numerous traffic-calming studies and highlights one of the key reasons radar speed signs work so well. Most speeders are just distracted drivers. Radar speed signs are an unobtrusive way to redirect driver attention to their current driving conditions. And that doesn’t require photos or ticketing.

I CAME ACROSS A study by Safe Kids USA that looked at distracted drivers in school zones. While it’s no surprise that distracted drivers are more likely to cause or be involved in an accident, some of the specifics noted in the report were surprising to me. For instance:

Fact. Drivers using a phone are as likely to get in an accident as drunk drivers ( .08 blood alcohol content). 

Fact. Drivers dialing a phone are six times more likely to be involved in an accident. 

Fact. Drivers texting on their phones are 23 times more likely to be involved in an accident. 

Fact. Drivers talking on a phone are four times more likely to be in an accident.      

Fact. Harvard Center for Risk Analysis estimated that in 2003, cell phone use was a factor in 636,000 crashes, 12,000 major injuries and 2,600 deaths.

But this post isn’t about bashing cell phone use. It’s about the impact of driving distractions in general and what we can do about it to increase pedestrian safety.

In the Safe Kids study, trained observers were posted in school zones located in 15 states throughout the U.S. They observed each car that passed through the school zone, making note of the drivers’ sex, the type of cars they were driving and any marked evidence of driver distractions. Of the 41,426 total drivers observed, about 7,000 of them (1 in 6) were distracted by something – eating, reaching in back, talking on a phone etc.

Specific findings include:

• Cell phone use was the number one leading distracter 
• Men and woman drivers were abut equally distracted.
• Distracted drivers appeared more frequently in school zones without flashing lights.
• Drivers of SUVs, pickup trucks and other large vehicles tended to be distracted more than car drivers.
• Drivers not using their seat belts were 35% more likely to be distracted than those who did use seat belts.

Why does any of this matter? I suggest two reasons:

1. Distractions lead to more accidents as well as a higher severity of accidents when crashes do occur.       

2. Traffic calming methods that interrupt diver distractions during critical times (such as while passing through school zones( are particularly important in reducing accidents.

As the Safe Kids report points out, a distraction that takes the driver’s mind off of his or her driving environment can have a huge impact on accident avoidance. By the time you calculate how long it takes for a driver to see a child run into the street, for the brain to process the situation and for the driver to make a decision on how to avoid the hazard, a car traveling just 30 mph will have traveled about 33 feet. Once you add driver reaction time and the time it takes the car to stp, it has now traveled about 104 feet from when the danger was first spotted.

From Safe Kids USA

That’s on a dry road…with clear conditions…without driver distractions. For each second that the driver is distracted, you can add another 33 feet to that stopping distance.

Radar speed signs, variable speed limit signs and violation alert signs are all bout refocusing a driver’s attention away from distractions and back onto his or her own driving speed and road conditions. And they work.

A variety of government studies show that radar speedcheck signs are one of the most highly effective means of reducing accidents in school zones, work zones and other places where pedestrian safety is of particular concern.

And now we know why.

If interested, you can find a nice collection of links to many of these government traffic calming studies at www.informationdisplay.com.

Speed bumps. Just say the word in a crowd and chances are you’ll soon start arguments that’ll make today’s town hall meetings seem sedate. While most everyone agrees speeding cars pose a real danger to school children and other pedestrians, there is a growing contingent of people who are fervently opposed to the use of speed bumps.

While protests against these axle-grinding obstructions continue to top the news throughout the U.K., stateside opposition has also begun to make headlines. From Los Angeles to Tampa Bay; Salt Lake City to Mesa Grande, newspaper articles highlight the fact that citizens across the country are up in arms about the disconcerting use of speed bumps by local governments looking to slow traffic.

There are now social network groups such as The Anti Speed Bump Club on Facebooks and organizations like The National Motorists Association and CRASH (Citizens Against Speed Humps), web sites such as No Speed Bumps.com, and bloggers such as Richard Layman in Washington D.C. and Cartype in Chicago. There are forums and essays, commentators and editorials – all who’ve had enough with this antiquated and obstructive means of slowing traffic.

Do speed bumps work? Sure, for the 1 to 3 feet of space that they take up on the road. But according to several government studies, drivers often try to make up the “lost time” or just relieve their frustrations over their use by speeding up between each bump.

Other reasons that a growing number of people are saying “no” to speed bumps in their neighborhood include:

1. They impede emergency vehicles
2. They simply divert traffic to streets without the obstructions
3. They increase traffic noise
4. They reduce fuel efficiency
5. They increase pollution
6. They ruin car suspension
7. They can be a hazard to wheelchairs and bicyclists

The troubling part of all this is that there are traffic-calming solutions that are more effective and less troublesome. In some cases, simple changes to street design can have a huge impact on slowing cars. Radar speed signs have also proven to be highly effective and highly rated by neighborhoods where they are employed.

Bottom line: speed bumps are on the outs – and should be. They represent an antiquated solution to a legitimate problem – one where alternative solutions offer more effective results without the considerable side effects.